in  Show more search options Additional Search Options
 
  • 350 leading medical journals
  • 28 specialties covered
  • Ranked, rated and reviewed by experts
  • Delivered on your terms
Subscribe

Effectiveness of five different approaches in management of urinary tract infection: randomised controlled trial
Little, P..., Moore, M...V..., Turner, S... | BMJ | vol. 340, c199 -  , 2010

To view our Expert Rating and Evidence Rank Login or Subscribe Read the Article Rate this Article

SUBJECT Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health  >  Medical Education, Practice Issues, General Women's Health

Abstract

Objective: 

To assess the impact of different management strategies in urinary tract infections.

Design: 

Randomised controlled trial.

Setting: 

Primary care.

Participants: 

309 non-pregnant women aged 18-70 presenting with suspected urinary tract infection.

Intervention: 

Patients were randomised to five management approaches: empirical antibiotics; empirical delayed (by 48 hours) antibiotics; or targeted antibiotics based on a symptom score (two or more of urine cloudiness, urine smell, nocturia, or dysuria), a dipstick result (nitrite or both leucocytes and blood), or a positive result on midstream urine analysis. Self help advice was controlled in each group.

Main Outcome Measures: 

Symptom severity (days 2 to 4) and duration, and use of antibiotics.

Results: 

Patients had 3.5days of moderately bad symptoms if they took antibiotics immediately. There were no significant differences in duration or severity of symptoms (mean frequency of symptoms on a 0 to 6 scale: immediate antibiotics 2.15, midstream urine 2.08, dipstick 1.74, symptom score 1.77, delayed antibiotics 2.11; likelihood ratio test for the five groups P=0.177). There were differences in antibiotic use (immediate antibiotics 97%, midstream urine 81%, dipstick 80%, symptom score 90%, delayed antibiotics 77%; P=0.011) and in sending midstream urine samples (immediate antibiotics 23%, midstream urine 89%, dipstick 36%, symptom score 33%, delayed antibiotics 15%; P<0.001). Patients who waited at least 48 hours to start taking antibiotics reconsulted less (hazard ratio 0.57 (95% confidence interval 0.36 to 0.89), P=0.014) but on average had symptoms for 37% longer than those taking immediate antibiotics (incident rate ratio 1.37 (1.11 to 1.68), P=0.003), particularly the midstream urine group (73% longer, 22% to 140%; none of the other groups had more than 22% longer duration).

Conclusion: 

All management strategies achieve similar symptom control. There is no advantage in routinely sending midstream urine samples for testing, and antibiotics targeted with dipstick tests with a delayed prescription as backup, or empirical delayed prescription, can help to reduce antibiotic use.

Study Registration: 

National Research Register N0484094184 ISRCTN: 03525333.

Meet the Expert:
L.P. Shulman MD

To view Expert Rating
Login or Subscribe

Home    Browse    Search    My Profile    My Alerts Top of page

Registered User Agreement  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms and Conditions

Copyright © 2007, Elsevier Inc . All rights reserved.

Other web sites from Elsevier Health:
iConsult: Clinical Decision Support | ProceduresConsult | Expert Consult | Student Consult | Path Consult
USMLE Consult | The Clinics | OncologySTAT | The Lancet | ElsevierHealth.com | ElsevierHealthCareers.com
Imaging Consult

An Elsevier Product